You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Can it be faster than FastEasyMapping? MJExtension take 15 seconds and FastEasyMapping take 8 seconds #197
using current MJExtension example. it take about 15 seconds to process 100 rows of json data. Using FastEasyMapping, it only take about 8 seconds. I am looking for solution which will take about 4 seconds. https://gist.github.com/steve21124/0cd62b06047d7a98a6ce
changed the title [-]Can it be faster than FastEasyMapping?[/-][+]Can it be faster than FastEasyMapping? MJExtension take 15 seconds and FastEasyMapping take 8 seconds[/+]on Sep 8, 2015
Activity
[-]Can it be faster than FastEasyMapping?[/-][+]Can it be faster than FastEasyMapping? MJExtension take 15 seconds and FastEasyMapping take 8 seconds[/+]Add more test for
Add more tests for
Boost speed in circumstance, which updates a few property or creates …