Skip to content

[Bug] [Kudu] Unsupported type: [TIMESTAMP_WITHOUT_TIME_ZONE] #1256

Closed

Description

@JaryZhen

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

What happened

java.lang.RuntimeException: com.dtstack.chunjun.throwable.ChunJunRuntimeException: com.dtstack.chunjun.throwable.UnsupportedTypeException: Unsupported type: [TIMESTAMP_WITHOUT_TIME_ZONE]

at com.dtstack.chunjun.client.LauncherTest.testYarn(LauncherTest.java:95)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:69)
at com.intellij.rt.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater$1.execute(IdeaTestRunner.java:38)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.TestsRepeater.repeat(TestsRepeater.java:11)
at com.intellij.rt.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:35)
at com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:235)
at com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:54)

Caused by: com.dtstack.chunjun.throwable.ChunJunRuntimeException: com.dtstack.chunjun.throwable.UnsupportedTypeException: Unsupported type: [TIMESTAMP_WITHOUT_TIME_ZONE]
at com.dtstack.chunjun.Main.parseCheck(Main.java:153)
at com.dtstack.chunjun.Main.main(Main.java:125)
at com.dtstack.chunjun.client.local.LocalClusterClientHelper.submit(LocalClusterClientHelper.java:35)
at com.dtstack.chunjun.client.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:120)
at com.dtstack.chunjun.client.LauncherTest.testYarn(LauncherTest.java:93)
... 27 more
Caused by: com.dtstack.chunjun.throwable.UnsupportedTypeException: Unsupported type: [TIMESTAMP_WITHOUT_TIME_ZONE]
at com.dtstack.chunjun.connector.kudu.converter.KuduRawTypeConverter.apply(KuduRawTypeConverter.java:75)
at com.dtstack.chunjun.util.TableUtil.createTableSchema(TableUtil.java:185)
at com.dtstack.chunjun.util.TableUtil.createRowType(TableUtil.java:170)
at com.dtstack.chunjun.connector.kudu.table.KuduDynamicTableSink.getSinkRuntimeProvider(KuduDynamicTableSink.java:90)
at org.apache.flink.table.planner.plan.nodes.common.CommonPhysicalSink.createSinkTransformation(CommonPhysicalSink.scala:78)
at org.apache.flink.table.planner.plan.nodes.physical.stream.StreamExecSink.translateToPlanInternal(StreamExecSink.scala:109)
at org.apache.flink.table.planner.plan.nodes.physical.stream.StreamExecSink.translateToPlanInternal(StreamExecSink.scala:43)
at org.apache.flink.table.planner.plan.nodes.exec.ExecNode.translateToPlan(ExecNode.scala:59)
at org.apache.flink.table.planner.plan.nodes.exec.ExecNode.translateToPlan$(ExecNode.scala:57)
at org.apache.flink.table.planner.plan.nodes.physical.stream.StreamExecSink.translateToPlan(StreamExecSink.scala:43)
at org.apache.flink.table.planner.delegation.StreamPlanner.$anonfun$translateToPlan$1(StreamPlanner.scala:66)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$map$1(TraversableLike.scala:233)
at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:937)
at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach$(Iterator.scala:937)
at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1425)
at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach(IterableLike.scala:70)
at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach$(IterableLike.scala:69)
at scala.collection.AbstractIterable.foreach(Iterable.scala:54)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map(TraversableLike.scala:233)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map$(TraversableLike.scala:226)
at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.map(Traversable.scala:104)
at org.apache.flink.table.planner.delegation.StreamPlanner.translateToPlan(StreamPlanner.scala:65)
at org.apache.flink.table.planner.delegation.StreamPlanner.explain(StreamPlanner.scala:103)
at org.apache.flink.table.planner.delegation.StreamPlanner.explain(StreamPlanner.scala:42)
at org.apache.flink.table.api.internal.TableEnvironmentImpl.explainInternal(TableEnvironmentImpl.java:630)
at org.apache.flink.table.api.internal.StatementSetImpl.explain(StatementSetImpl.java:92)
at com.dtstack.chunjun.Main.parseCheck(Main.java:147)
... 31 more

What you expected to happen

none

How to reproduce

CREATE TABLE source_ods_fact_user_ippv
(
f_sequence INT,
f_random INT,
f_random_str STRING,
tss TIMESTAMP
) WITH (
'connector' = 'kafka-x',
'topic' = 'xxnk',
'properties.bootstrap.servers' = 'xxx',
'properties.group.id' = 'luna_g1',
'scan.startup.mode' = 'latest-offset',
'format' = 'json' --,'json.timestamp-format.standard' = 'SQL'
);

create table iot_product
(
f_sequence INT,
f_random INT,
f_random_str STRING,
tss TIMESTAMP
) WITH (
'connector' = 'kudu-x',
'masters' = 'xxx',
'table-name' = 'xxx',
'sink.parallelism' = '2'
);

INSERT INTO iot_product
select *
from source_ods_fact_user_ippv;

Anything else

No response

Version

master

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

Activity

  1. meng1222 commented on Sep 14, 2022

    @meng1222
    Contributor

    This problem should be caused by this line of code:link

  2. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Sep 15, 2022
  3. added a commit that references this issue on Sep 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions