[dajneem23]

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #2722

Rationale

delete_segments already exists in binary/CLI/MCP and the HTTP SDK client already sends it, but the server HTTP API had no matching handler, so requests returned 404. This left HTTP behavior inconsistent with other transports.

What changed?

cargo fmt --all, cargo check -p server, cargo test -p integration --test mod --no-run cargo test --package integration --test mod -- server::general::authentication --nocapture

• Added server-side HTTP support for delete_segments in core/server/src/http/segments.rs, following the same flow as partitions: parse path/query, validate, run permission check, -call delete_segments_base, and apply DeleteSegments state command.
• Registered/kept the HTTP route wiring in the server HTTP router path for /streams/{stream_id}/topics/{topic_id}/partitions/{partition_id} with DELETE.
• Enhanced core/integration/tests/server/scenarios/system_scenario.rs to call delete_segments at the end and verify partition segments_count before/after.
• Updated web/docs/server-api.http with:

`DELETE {{url}}/streams/1/topics/1/partitions/1?segments_count=3`  
`Authorization: Bearer {{access_token}}`

(Path params: `stream_id`, `topic_id`, `partition_id`; query param: `segments_count`.)

Local Execution

• Passed:

• cargo fmt --all

• cargo check -p server

• cargo test -p integration --test mod --no-run

• cargo test --package integration --test mod -- server::general::authentication --nocapture

• Pre-commit hooks ran: ran

AI Usage

1. Tool: ChatGPT (Codex)
2. Scope: PR text drafting and test generation/updates system_scenario.rs
3. Verification: Local formatting/check/test commands listed above
4. Yes, every line can be explained if asked

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 68.34%. Comparing base (6735eea) to head (8497ad6).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
core/server/src/http/segments.rs	82.35%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #2804      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     68.33%   68.34%   +0.01%     
  Complexity      739      739              
============================================
  Files          1052     1053       +1     
  Lines         84745    84763      +18     
  Branches      61281    61308      +27     
============================================
+ Hits          57910    57933      +23     
+ Misses        24463    24452      -11     
- Partials       2372     2378       +6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
csharp	67.43% <ø> (-0.19%)	⬇️
go	6.27% <ø> (ø)
java	54.83% <ø> (ø)
node	92.26% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
python	81.57% <ø> (ø)
rust	70.05% <83.33%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
core/server/src/http/http_server.rs	48.30% <100.00%> (+0.21%)	⬆️
core/server/src/shard/system/segments.rs	89.60% <ø> (ø)
core/server/src/http/segments.rs	82.35% <82.35%> (ø)

... and 21 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[spetz]

Looks good, please update server.http file with example request in core/server and that should be it.