You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Should inactive card loose precedence over active card? #98
Right now the precedence rule is quite wacky. One way to improve it could be to strictly favorite an active card over an inactive one. To know which card id actually active or not we can follow the Wikipedia's table:
For example, we would have Visa over Switch for a card starting with 4903 and GPN over Solor for a card starting with 6334:
Our goal is to identify a card given a card number. I guess that there are more chance to cross the path of an active card over an inactive one.
We could make this another boolean option, eg preferActive = true, which you could explicitly set to false if you're working with potentially old cards.
We could set this as a boolean option, but set it to true by default. I think we already discussed this a while ago, I am in favor of trying the Ockham's razor approach: by default, return the most probable solution, and if it doesn't work, search for alternatives
Activity
Tarmil commentedon Oct 3, 2022
We could make this another boolean option, eg
preferActive = true, which you could explicitly set to false if you're working with potentially old cards.torendil commentedon Oct 3, 2022
We could set this as a boolean option, but set it to true by default. I think we already discussed this a while ago, I am in favor of trying the Ockham's razor approach: by default, return the most probable solution, and if it doesn't work, search for alternatives