Skip to content

[GHSA-fwhc-5w96-hjf3] SQL injection in the RelatedProduct block in Mageplaza... - #11037

Open
aadmathijssen wants to merge 1 commit into
aadmathijssen/advisory-improvement-11037from
aadmathijssen-GHSA-fwhc-5w96-hjf3
Open

aadmathijssen wants to merge 1 commit into
aadmathijssen/advisory-improvement-11037from
aadmathijssen-GHSA-fwhc-5w96-hjf3

Conversation

@aadmathijssen

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Updates

  • Affected products
  • Source code location
  • Summary

Comments
Added:

  • Ecosystem and package name
  • Affected and patched versions (*)
  • Source code location

(*) Even though the CVE states that the affected version if v4.3.2, it would be expected that it was fixed in v4.3.3.
However, the fix is found in v4.3.4, as part of commit 8457725, the diff of the Block/Post/RelatedProduct.php file to be precise.

Updated:

  • Title (the previous title was cut-off and did not contain all relevant information)

Copilot AI auto review requested due to automatic review settings November 9, 2026 08:13
@github-actions
github-actions Bot changed the base branch from main to aadmathijssen/advisory-improvement-11037 November 9, 2026 08:13

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note

Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.

Copilot review overview

1 open issue
What changed in this PR

Updates an unreviewed GitHub Security Advisory record to include a human-readable summary, affected package/version range, and an additional reference.

Changes:

  • Added summary describing the vulnerability and affected component.
  • Populated affected with Packagist package info and an introduced→fixed version range.
  • Added an extra repository reference URL and bumped modified timestamp.
File Description
advisories/​unreviewed/​2026/​09/​GHSA-fwhc-5w96-hjf3/​GHSA-fwhc-5w96-hjf3.json Enriches advisory metadata (summary, affected range, references) for better package matching and clarity.

Review effort: Lite (auto)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants