You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Cisco NX-OS: Round-trip delays for GNMI calls due to authentication/authorization/accounting (AAA) #164
If TACACS or other AAA configurations are used to authenticate human operators, a network-operator login triggers an authentication request to the TACACS/AAA server. The auth response is cached for 5 minutes as per verbal communication (unknown how authorization and accounting are handled for GNMI calls). If AAA servers are located in another geographical location, this entails heavy round-trip delays on each operation and adds a runtime dependency to the AAA servers.
Proposed Solution
We suggest implementing a bypass feature for specific local users to avoid triggering TACACS authentication requests for GNMI calls. This would reduce unnecessary latency, improve performance, and eliminate the dependency on remote AAA servers when processing GNMI operations.
Vendor Acknowledgement
Cisco has acknowledged this issue under ID: CSCwm61018 and plans to implement a AAA bypass for specific local users feature in release 10.6.3 (April 2026) or, worst case, in 10.7.1 (August 2026).
Workarounds
Disable AAA or use a TACACS user and accept degraded availability and performance as GNMI calls will be subject to authentication requests on each operation.
changed the title [-]Cisco NXOS: Round-trip delays for GNMI calls due to authentication/authorization/accounting (AAA)[/-][+]Cisco NX-OS: Round-trip delays for GNMI calls due to authentication/authorization/accounting (AAA)[/+]on Feb 4, 2026
Activity
[-]Cisco NXOS: Round-trip delays for GNMI calls due to authentication/authorization/accounting (AAA)[/-][+]Cisco NX-OS: Round-trip delays for GNMI calls due to authentication/authorization/accounting (AAA)[/+]github-actions commentedon Jun 24, 2026
This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no activity.
github-actions commentedon Jul 9, 2026
This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 14 days since being marked as stale.
github-actions commentedon Oct 8, 2026
This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no activity.