Repository navigation
FIX Allow more specific controller limits by specifying filepath, not just prefix - #278
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Also, remove an unnecessary attribute and correct a docstring.
…t setting via dicts and lists
itamarst
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 26, 2026 17:30
ogrisel
approved these changes
Oct 27, 2026
ogrisel
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM besides the following small details.
Co-authored-by: Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel@ensta.org>
Contributor
Author
|
I updated the docs to cover lists and |
Contributor
|
Thanks for the follow-up. Let me merge this. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #277
Previously
prefixwas used as the controlling key to identify LibControllers, butprefixis not guaranteed to be unique. Thus the switch tofilepath.While I was at it, I deleted some code that did unnecessary work of setting unused private attributes, possibly remnants of some old refactoring.
This is the companion to #275 so joblib can more reliably say "OpenBLAS+pthreads, if used, will be either 1 or cpu_count() cores and that's it". Given this change, joblib would do something like this: