Repository navigation
OpenJSF Proposal to move governance of the Travel Fund to the Cross Project Council #398
Description
Hello @nodejs/tsc and @nodejs/community-committee
The Cross Project Council has a 4-stage process for turning proposals into policy.
We now have a proposal to move the Travel Fund to the Cross Project Council, putting the proposal as a draft in the first of the 4 stages.
I'd like to solicit feedback and discussion for this proposal, since we do not want to move forward without collaboration with all parties involved.
Here's the PR for proposal:
openjs-foundation/cross-project-council#278
Specifics on how to manage the fund should probably be discussed there, but +1's or general questions could be in this thread to keep that one focussed on specifics.
Activity
Trott commentedon Aug 2, 2019
@nodejs/tsc @nodejs/community-committee ☝️
keywordnew commentedon Aug 7, 2019
This proposal is now in stage 2 of 4. Until the proposal graduates, I'd like to clarify that stewardship of the travel fund continues to be the responsibility of @nodejs/tsc and @nodejs/community-committee.
The intent is to ensure any related issues and PRs don't stall while openjs/#278 moves through the CPC approval process.
Sorry if I missed related comments during the CPC meeting earlier today.
mcollina commentedon Aug 15, 2019
Hey @nodejs/community-committee @nodejs/tsc, have you got any feedback? I've added this into the agenda for next meetings. The cross project council is looking to move fast on this one, so I would recommend to give all feedbacks in the next two weeks.
One of the point of discussion is if the TSC and CommComm have to vote on this (openjs-foundation/cross-project-council#283 (comment)). What's your opinion?
I've added this issue to both TSC and CommComm agendas.
mhdawson commentedon Aug 16, 2019
To capture this for the discussion. I did raise this in the last TSC meeting, not everybody was there but asked that if there were any objections/concerns that people comment in this issue or reach out to me or @mcollina. No specific/concerns issues where raised or discussed in the meeting.
keywordnew commentedon Aug 17, 2019
The stage 1 proposal was part of the updates @joesepi shared at the last CommComm meeting. There were no objections. We can discuss the stage 2 proposal next week. Unlikely to be new objections since the content hasn't changed. I'm also making myself available to discuss any concerns or ideas related to this.
amiller-gh commentedon Aug 27, 2019
We raised this in the last CommComm meeting as well – there are no objections from the committee.
Jonahss commentedon Aug 27, 2019
Sounds all good then. Discussion will continue in the PR's for the proposal itself in https://github.com/openjs-foundation/cross-project-council/pulls