You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey folks. This issue hasn't received any traction for 60 days, so we're going to close this for housekeeping. If this is still an ongoing issue, please do consider contributing a Pull Request to resolve it. Further discussion is always welcome even with the issue closed. If anything actionable is posted in the comments, we'll consider reopening it. ⓘ
I met same problem and maybe actual issue.
Internal patterns for typeof (e.g. typeof process !==) does not work because of delimiters ['\\b', '\\b(?!\\.)'] added by #1088.
Hey folks. This issue hasn't received any traction for 60 days, so we're going to close this for housekeeping. If this is still an ongoing issue, please do consider contributing a Pull Request to resolve it. Further discussion is always welcome even with the issue closed. If anything actionable is posted in the comments, we'll consider reopening it. ⓘ
Activity
stale commentedon Jul 12, 2022
Hey folks. This issue hasn't received any traction for 60 days, so we're going to close this for housekeeping. If this is still an ongoing issue, please do consider contributing a Pull Request to resolve it. Further discussion is always welcome even with the issue closed. If anything actionable is posted in the comments, we'll consider reopening it. ⓘ
niba1122 commentedon Aug 24, 2022
I met same problem and maybe actual issue.
Internal patterns for
typeof(e.g.typeof process !==) does not work because of delimiters['\\b', '\\b(?!\\.)']added by #1088.privatenumber commentedon Aug 24, 2022
I don't think it was ever working:
stale commentedon Apr 27, 2025
Hey folks. This issue hasn't received any traction for 60 days, so we're going to close this for housekeeping. If this is still an ongoing issue, please do consider contributing a Pull Request to resolve it. Further discussion is always welcome even with the issue closed. If anything actionable is posted in the comments, we'll consider reopening it. ⓘ