Skip to content

Add advisory for xmloxide DTD content-model stack overflow (CVE-2026-61727) - #3436

Open
williamareynolds wants to merge 1 commit into
rustsec:mainfrom
williamareynolds:xmloxide-cve-2026-61727
Open

williamareynolds wants to merge 1 commit into
rustsec:mainfrom
williamareynolds:xmloxide-cve-2026-61727

Conversation

@williamareynolds

@williamareynolds williamareynolds commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Affected crate(s)

  • xmloxide (45,694 recent downloads per crates.io)

Links to upstream issue(s) or PR(s)

  • Upstream issue asking the maintainer to confirm this advisory: jonwiggins/xmloxide !71
  • Fix: jonwiggins/xmloxide@d606e11 (released in 0.4.4 on 2026-07-20; the commit message cites CVE-2026-61727 / GHSA-7jmw-29gc-ffx4)
  • I reported this privately on 2026-06-23 through GitHub private vulnerability reporting, as GHSA-7jmw-29gc-ffx4. GitHub's CNA assigned CVE-2026-61727 on 2026-07-10. The GHSA is still in draft.

Severity

Allows unauthenticated remote denial of service through stack exhaustion in cases such as SAML certificate parsing, among others. A small document whose DTD internal subset has an <!ELEMENT> content model with deeply nested ( makes the parser recurse without bound and aborts the process. CVSS 3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H (7.5), CWE-674.

Checklist

  • Advisory filename(s) starts with RUSTSEC-0000-0000 as the ID
  • date field is set to the public disclosure date
  • Contains a concise and descriptive title after advisory metadata
  • Asked maintainer(s) if publishing an advisory is appropriate

I have asked the maintainer to resolve the advisory directly in this issue. They have been unresponsive on the GHSA and via email for the past several months.

…61727)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@djc

djc commented Oct 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Please use the pull request template (which, among other things, asks for confirmation from a maintainer that they think an advisory is appropriate).

@williamareynolds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Please use the pull request template (which, among other things, asks for confirmation from a maintainer that they think an advisory is appropriate).

Sorry about that. I didn't really intend for that to be posted yet. I've updated to the right template and I've linked the public issue where I've asked the author to publish the advisory.

@djc

djc commented Oct 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Feel free to ping me here if they haven't responded in 2 weeks.

@williamareynolds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Feel free to ping me here if they haven't responded in 2 weeks.

@djc it's been two weeks with no response.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants