add makeType with unidirectional()  #10

Activity

1. ghost assigned

   vadasg

   on Nov 9, 2012
2. okram commented on Nov 9, 2012

   

   okram

   on Nov 9, 2012

   More actions

   Make sure for only edges you don't want bidirectional trvaersal. It is
   usually the case you want bidirectional traversal. Unidirectional is
   usually used for for ontological mappings.
   On Nov 8, 2012 6:52 PM, "Vadas Gintautas" notifications@github.com wrote:

   should make for a cleaner graph for faunus

   —
   Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/10.
3. vadasg commented on Nov 11, 2012

   

   vadasg

   on Nov 11, 2012

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   Ok. I've reviewed the schema and I believe all of the edges should be unidirectional for GitHubArchive, since they are all generated by unilateral events (as far as the vertices are concerned). That is, a user -- pushes -->commit -- to --> repository but a repository never 'to' a commit or a commit never 'pushes' a user. Worse yet, if User1 -- follows -- User2 that is not the same thing as User2 -- follows --> User1.
4. okram commented on Nov 11, 2012

   

   okram

   on Nov 11, 2012

   More actions

   Let's talk about this... You are not thinking right.. its not the semantics
   of the link, but the requirement of the travesal. Unidirwctional is all
   about high entroy in the information sense.... On skype ping me.

   http://markorodriguez.com
   On Nov 10, 2012 6:14 PM, "Vadas Gintautas" notifications@github.com wrote:

   Ok. I've reviewed the schema and I believe all of the edges should be
   unidirectional for GitHubArchive, since they are all generated by
   unilateral events (as far as the vertices are concerned). That is, a user
   -- pushes -->commit -- to --> repository but a repository never 'to' a
   commit or a commit never 'pushes' a user. Worse yet, if User1 -- follows --
   User2 that is not the same thing as User2 -- follows --> User1.

   —
   Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/10#issuecomment-10262082.